Wednesday, 2 April 2014
Tuesday, 1 April 2014
Vertigo time !
Insane video: Guy walks slackline over 200-foot pit without any safety
Jesus Diaz on Sploid, shared by Casey Chan to Gizmodo, Gawker MediaFeb 28, 2014, 11.18 AM IST
Flaviu Cernescu is a daredevil who likes to walk slacklines and tightropes, as well as driving his monocycle on the craziest high places. This video shows one of his fearless antics over a 200-foot-deep reservoir drain in Lake Iovanu, Romania. I feel like passing out every time I look at it.
Oh..now I get it why there was an inordinate delay of 8 yrs !
Bitta targets, Sheila, Ambika, Sibal
Attacking the Congress government in Delhi, he accused Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit of backstabbing him by withdrawing his security. He said his party dumped him and left to die despite him being on terrorists' hit list.
Bitta targeted senior party leaders Kapil Sibal and Ambika Soni, accusing them of working against the party's interest and him despite his sacrifices. He slammed Union minister Sibal for fighting the case of Bhullar as a senior lawyer. He alleged that former minister Soni told him that the party high command has asked him to keep silent on the issue of execution of Bhullar and Afzal Guru.
Top 5 Reasons Not To Buy the Samsung Galaxy S5
Top 5 Reasons Not To Buy the Samsung Galaxy S5
Surbhi ChawlaMar 28, 2014, 03.20 PM ISTSamsung has showcased its flagship smartphone Galaxy S5 in India. The smartphone will go on pre-order from March 29, 2014 and will be available in stores starting April 11. As of now, Samsung has refrained from sharing the exact price of the Samsung Galaxy S5 in India. Enthusiastic consumers who want to get the smartphone first, will have to shell out Rs 1,500 to pre-book it. Samsung did indicate that it will cost between Rs 51,000 and Rs 53,000.
But does it really make sense to shell out over Rs 50,000 on the Samsung Galaxy S5? Here are five reasons why you are better of without it.
1) Pricey Little Thing
We were expecting the Samsung Galaxy S5 to be priced somewhere around Rs 45,000 and so we feel at the current price, this smartphone is way too expensive. You might want to wait for the price drop.
2) Shiny ain't glamorous anymore
It was expected that Samsung would be adopting a metal case for the Samsung Galaxy S5. In fact, there were a lot of rumours suggesting a metal-clad Samsung Galaxy S5 in the works. However, what we got was the boring old plastic body.
If that is not enough, the design of Samsung Galaxy S5 is quite a departure from last year's flagship. Samsung likes to call it shiny, perforated back that looks like leather, but is actually polycarbonate in a "modern glam look," it actually borders on grubby.
3) Battery
In the world where we are seeing smartphones that have battery just shy of 4,000mAh, Samsung Galaxy S5 comes with 2,800mAh battery. Though the Ultra Power Saving Mode is a nice add-on, but in a 50K phone we were expecting little more than that.
4) No LTE
The Samsung Galaxy S5 launched in India just supports 3G and there is no support for LTE. Samsung has mentioned that they will evaluate the situation and afterwards might come with the LTE variant. However, has given no clear signals about the same.
5) Processor
Samsung Galaxy S5 launched in India comes with a 1.9GHz Exynos Octa-core processor. While in the European and North American markets, Galaxy S5 variants packs in a 2.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor.
Samsung had adopted a similar strategy for the launch of Samsung Galaxy S4. We are a bit disappointed at the news as the Octa-core Exynos processor has a tendency to heat up.
Wow ..and Mr Home Minister ordered an inquiry into AAPs foreign funding !
AAP wants Congress, BJP to disclose names of fund-givers
Aam Aadmi Party on Saturday challenged Congress and BJP to disclose the names of people from whom they have got more than 80 per cent of their funds being spent in the Lok Sabha election campaign.
“The silence of these two parties on the Delhi High Court’s judgement which held them guilty of accepting foreign funds in violation of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act makes it clear that the Congress and the BJP are hand in glove on the issue of taking huge financial favours from corporate houses in return of providing them undue benefits wherever these two parties are in government,” AAP said in a press release on Saturday.
The Delhi High Court had on Friday directed the authorities to take action against Congress and BJP for receiving donations from United Kingdom-based Vedanta Resources’ subsidiaries on the ground that it violates laws. AAP demanded that Election Commission of India should monitor the probe into the foreign funding of Congress and BJP, stating that the Home Ministry, which had virtually given a “clean chit” to these two parties, cannot be expected to complete an impartial investigation.
“The EC, which has taken concrete steps in curbing the use of black money in elections, should treat this case as an example to come down hard on the corporate-political nexus, exposed by the landmark High Court judgement,” AAP said.
The release further stated that the funds received from the Indian subsidiaries of England based Vedanta Resources by the Congress and BJP raised serious allegations of conflict of interest and bribery. “These allegations cannot be brushed under the carpet and the AAP demands that the EC should seek all details from these parties about all clearances provided by their governments to these companies and when did they receive funds from these companies,” it added.
In a series of questions, AAP asked Congress and BJP to come clean on crores of rupees received as donations from foreign sources during a certain period of time. “Can the Congress deny that it has received nearly Rs. 10 crore as funds from foreign source in violation of the law between 2003-04 and 2011-12? Can the BJP deny that it has received almost Rs. 20 crore foreign funds over the same period?” AAP asked.
“Can BJP deny that it has even received foreign funds from the Dow Chemical Company, which acquired the Union Carbide Corporation, that was responsible for India’s worst industrial disaster — the 1984 Bhopal Gas Tragedy?,” it added.
AAP also questioned the silence of Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde over the Delhi HC judgement.
“Why is Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde silent after the Delhi High Court found his Ministry to be giving a wrong explanation on the foreign funding of the Congress and the BJP?” AAP said.
“The Delhi High Court’s judgement on the petition jointly filed by EAS Sarma (former secretary in the central government) and the Association for Democratic Reforms, makes it clear that the Home Ministry and the Election Commission have to take action against these two parties. The High Court judgement has come at a very crucial time, when the campaigning for the Lok Sabha elections is in full swing,” the statement said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)