Friday, 1 August 2014

Samsung to jump the gun, launch Galaxy Note 4 ahead of IFA in September


not the samsung galaxy note 4 this is the 3 black aa (12)
Samsung may be gearing up to launch the Galaxy Note 4 in the days prior to the IFA trade fair in Berlin, Germany in September. The Korea Times is reporting that Samsung will launch the Galaxy Note 4 on September 3rd, reasoning that Samsung looks to gain as much footing as possible before Apple announces their own new smartphones in September.
The Korea Times cites several sources in Samsung’s parts supply chain, including suppliers of displays and camera modules, and is very confident in this launch date.
Whether Samsung launches ahead of IFA, during, or even at the end, we are very much looking forward to this device; with their poor sales numbers so far this year, they better hope that you are excited too. The Galaxy Note 4 may not entirely bring the company around, but it is certainly looking to be the hottest phone of the season by the specs.
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 AnTuTu
We took a good look at all of the rumors and compiled our Galaxy Note 4 ‘what we think we know‘ list about a week ago. In addition, this new info suggests that all four of the major US carriers are on-board with the device, but no actual shipping and availability dates are provided. As for those specs, here is the updated list of what we said we think we know:
  • 1.3GHz Samsung Exynos 5433 octa-core / 2.45GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (APQ8084) (depending on market)
  • ARM Mali-1760 GPU or Adreno 420 (depending on SoC)
  • 5.7-inch QHD display
  • 3GB of RAM
  • 16MP rear cam with Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3.68MP front cam
  • LTE support (plus an LTE-A version for South Korea)
  • 32GB storage with microSD (other configurations possible)
  • S pen support
  • Dust/water Resistance
  • New sensors: heart rate monitor, finger print reader, UV sensor
The Korea Times suggests that Samsung will bring a version of the Galaxy Note 4 with a curved display to show off at the launch and IFA, but it will not be available for purchase at initial launch.
Further confirmation of the UV sensor is provided, with the explanation that the sensor will be used along with S-Health to provide UV Radiation index levels. Perhaps your newGalaxy Note 4 will convince you you’ve seen enough beach time for the day, or that you have been locked in your cubicle for too long and should get outside for some vitamin D. We’ll have to wait for September 3rd to see where Samsung is going with this.
That’s it for now. We’ll see what new leaks and rumors spread in the next month as we await official announcement of the new powerhouse Samsung Galaxy Note 4.
Is this thing getting you excited yet?

What's next for Samsung?

The bigger you are...

For the past few years, Samsung has been on top of the smartphone world, outselling Apple’s iPhone and besting everyone else by creating powerful phones with big screens and small prices. But now the Korean company is getting a taste of its own medicine as a variety of small Chinese manufacturers are starting to deliver even cheaper phones with no less impressive capabilities. The smartphone market can’t stop growing, but Samsung smartphone sales are actually falling — and while undercutting the competition on price is still a viable strategy, others are now doing it better.
The world’s biggest smartphone maker didn’t get there by accident. Having spent years toiling in the shadow of feature-phone leaders like Nokia and Sony Ericsson, Samsung’s mobile division rose to prominence at the turn of the decade by embracing the Android platform aggressively. The Korean company was early to the smartphone fight and more agile than most. While Nokia and BlackBerry were ponderously trying to evolve their outdated software, Samsung was focused on just cramming the highest specs inside the cheapest phone. It wasn’t pretty, extraordinarily well made, or in any way original, but a Samsung Galaxy phone was assured to give you the most for your money.
A VAST, INTEGRATED SUPPLY CHAIN CAN BE A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD
The problem of slumping sales for Samsung should not be underestimated. This may be a company that makes everything from oceanic drilling rigs to kitchen sinks, but more than half of its operating profit comes from its mobile business. And while a vertically integrated supply chain gives Samsung the advantage of developing new and exclusive technologies, it also means that any loss of business is felt multiple times over. Samsung Display depends on assured demand from Samsung Mobile, and when one falters, the other feels the pain too. There’s no better example of how quickly things can unravel for a dominant company than Nokia’s experience since the turn of the century. Having once grown to accommodate demand for hundreds of millions of phones per year, the Finnish company had to be painfully dismantled when its Symbian and Maemo platforms were devastated by Android’s ascendancy.
It’s obvious that Samsung’s growth couldn’t continue indefinitely, but what’s happening at the moment is that people are replacing Samsung devices with cheaper alternatives. According to the latest IDC figures, Huawei has doubled its smartphone shipments over the past year, Lenovo has risen dramatically, and a further dozen Chinese companies like Mi are in with a chance of making it into the top five vendors in the world. Samsung should be nervous.
There are numerous reasons for Samsung’s recent stagnation. One is that the old spec race has basically run its course. In the days when the Galaxy S II was fighting it out against the HTC Sensation, Samsung could tout the fastest processor, nicest display, and best camera around, but now all of those specifications have generally plateaued. Samsung’s octa-core processor offers little to compel a buyer that might consider a less overpowered phone. And the greatness of Super AMOLED displays has been matched and even surpassed by IPS LCD screens. Samsung’s old technological edge has been dulled, its pricing advantage has been dispelled, and now the company’s left with trying to convince people it’s worth their time through software and design.
THE SPEC WAR’S OVER AND SAMSUNG HAS NO PEACETIME PLAN
To its credit, Samsung’s leadership has shown no lack of foresight. The company has made constant and repeated efforts to make its Tizen (once known as Bada) software a viable platform to compete with Android. Knowing the importance of having something unique to keep users engaged, it’s built up its own app store, partnered with the likes of Amazon for Galaxy-exclusive Kindle offers, and built a comprehensive suite of tweaks and additions to the basic Android OS running on its phones.
The problem has been execution. The Samsung UI that was once known as TouchWiz has earned derision for being bloated, bloopy, and unintuitive, while the subscription-based Samsung Music Hub was recently shuttered due to lack of user interest. Ironically, Samsung’s now struggling with the same sort of software issues that gave it the opportunity to become a leading phone manufacturer in the first place.
The outlook isn’t much rosier when it comes to design. Samsung’s last three Galaxy S flagship phones have all come in for criticism for their cheap, plasticky feel and fake metal aesthetics. The latest S5, in particular, has been the butt of a recurring Band-Aid joke, owing to the dimpled pattern on its back. Samsung tries incredibly hard to be a design leader — both in software and hardware — but the real world rewards results rather than aspirations, and the company’s products have struggled to cross a threshold of excellence that would inspire loyalty and delight among its user base.

More than anything, Samsung’s issue is one of brand loyalty. The company has poured billions into marketing itself as Apple’s equal, but it has never achieved the depth of affection that its Cupertino rival commands. Samsung has sought to be the pragmatic rather than aspirational choice: pay less, get more. That works only so long as Samsung is indeed winning on price or specs, but when one starts to be undercut by competitors and the other ceases to be quite so important, the vast number of current Samsung users and the company’s incredible manufacturing capabilities start to become irrelevant. They mean nothing to a person looking to buy his or her next phone.
THESE PROBLEMS AREN’T NEW, THEY’VE JUST BEEN PATCHED OVER BY GROWING SALES
The failure to properly address the two critical issues of software and industrial design is starting to catch up with Samsung monetarily, but there’s still plenty of time to correct course. The evolution of the company’s Gear smartwatches from the experimental and thoroughly flawed Galaxy Gear a year ago to the much-improved Gear Live today shows a company learning quickly from its mistakes. The Gear Fit is a brilliant use of Samsung’s curved AMOLED display, though its software still needs a lot of work. The agile and aggressive Samsung of old is still around, channeling its efforts toward wearables, but it might be time to bring that same attitude back to smartphones as well. If Samsung were to learn — not copy — from its competitors like the all-aluminum HTC One or brilliantly ergonomic Moto X, it could finally start living up to the haughty claims in its pervasive ads and promotions.
Mobile chief J.K. Shin has promised that at least one new phone this year will be made of "new materials," offering hope that Samsung is finally ready to stop emulating leather and metal and start actually using premium materials in its phones. Samsung has always been able to build phones that sell well on paper and on store shelves, but to engender the sort of customer loyalty that won’t evaporate with the merest hint of price competition, it needs to give us the complete package: an uncompromised phone that can outsell the iPhone because it truly is better.

We are all Glassholes now !!

What does it mean to live "in the moment" if we're taking photos 24/7?

2013 was the year of the Glasshole — the year that technology made one of its most violent entries into our personal lives at bars, restaurants, workplaces, and homes. Public backlash stemmed from concerns about Glass’ clandestine camera, and about fears of being documented publicly without consent. But really, Glass isn’t much different from the cameras we already use. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of our obsession with documentation, the most logical scapegoat for a much larger trend: we’re addicted to recording our lives, and shunning Glass isn’t going to change that.
At a concert for The National a month or so ago, I could barely see the stage over the expanse of glowing smartphone screens. Some screens were Snapchatting, some were Instagramming, and some were just taking photos using the stock camera app. Some of them — the Super AMOLED ones, perhaps — were brighter than others, but all of them were distracting. I hated these people. I hated that they weren’t paying attention. “Put down the phone,” I thought.
A few nights ago I went to another show, this time a much smaller affair for a much smaller band. A few photogs buzzed around the front of the stage snapping photos with DSLRs, but at this show there were otherwise no glowing screens to be found. It made for an almost awkward silence. Keeping your phone in your pants was evidently the cool thing to do at this concert. It meant something. Was the recording fetish over? Then I felt the itch.
Dvf-google-glass-18_2040

I pulled out my phone and held it up. I needed to record this moment, to remember it, to post it, to share it, to have it. I looked around at my fellow concert-goers, eyes trained on the stage, and I cringed. Were these people more "present," — more "in the moment" than me? Were they farther along in the ever-changing evolution of integrating tech into our lives? Do I have time to add this to my Snapchat Story? If I don’t shoot some photos or at least check in on Foursquare, how will I remember that I was even here? My brain had flipped off. I was recording the band’s best track on video, so my brain had determined that it needn’t make room for this memory. I was the Glasshole, antagonized, drawing side-eye from every possible direction.
In early 2012, sociology researcher Nathan Jurgenson wrote "We are in danger of developing a ‘Facebook Eye’: our brains always looking for moments where the ephemeral blur of lived experience might best be translated into a Facebook post; one that will draw the most comments and ‘likes.’" Jurgenson cautioned, "Are we becoming so concerned about posting our lives on Facebook that we forget to live our lives in the here-and-now?" Today, we have developed much more than a Facebook eye. We’ve developed an eye for capturing anything worth preserving on social media or in our private digital clouds. Capturing the world is addictive, and easier than ever before.
"NOW, YOU CONVEY RESPECT AND IMPORTANCE BY NOT TAKING A PHOTO."
"Some would say that we’ve crossed the threshold of photos being too abundant," says Jurgenson, who’s now a researcher at Snapchat. "[Years ago] if you saw someone taking a photo you’d stop and say ‘That must be important.’ Now, you convey respect and importance by not taking a photo." You could chalk up the phone-less concert to its clientele — a bunch of hip Williamsburg folk — but what’s more important is how young these people were. They were daring themselves not to record a show, and daring themselves to remember it firsthand. These people aren’t technophobes. They’ve just already experienced the age of taking 100 photos per minute, generating a massive photo library, and never looking at any of it. For them, the novelty has worn off. At the very least, they’re more selective about what they’re recording.
We’ve all already adopted the "Facebook Eye," but the addiction might be subsiding.
Kanyewestiphone
"If you look at pretty much every new technology that comes along, one that offers us some very exciting and catalytic new power, we have a historical tendency to totally overdo it," says Clive Thompson, author of Smarter Than You Think. "We are so intoxicated by it, and then there’s a fairly predictable curve of us recognizing as a society that this is untenable, and we’re acting like freaks. and then we slowly calm down." Thompson points to several similar trends, like your dad constantly shooting home videos in the early ’90s on his new camera, and how everyone used to pick up their cellphone whenever it rang.
"It didn’t matter whatever else they were doing — dinner with families, at church, at temple, at a funeral, if they are having sex, they answer it. It was what you did," says Thompson. "That lasted for five years, but what happens is, the behavior becomes so omnipresent that we begin to notice how we’re acting, and the early adopters start to back away from it. Now it’s unusual for people to lunge for the phone when it rings." I still have the photo itch, but I feel it waning. Five years ago, I used to shoot videos of my favorite song at every concert. Today, I snap a few photos, shoot a video of my favorite chorus, and put the phone back in my pocket. My documentation is less frequent, but more precise.
"THE BEHAVIOR BECOMES SO OMNIPRESENT THAT WE BEGIN TO NOTICE HOW WE’RE ACTING, AND THE EARLY ADOPTERS START TO BACK AWAY FROM IT."
According to Pew, 80 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 post photos online, and that percentage is increasing across all age groups. Across Snapchat, WhatsApp, and Facebook alone, we post 1.5 billion photos per day. We are all Glassholes, only to varying degrees, and we’re all still figuring out what a future looks like where we can document anything — a sound, a sight, a 360-degree-panorama — in less than 10 seconds.
In this new world of hyper-documentation we’ll have to figure out what feels right and what doesn’t — new etiquettes and customs and mores. These new norms will focus on utility and also social acceptance. Glass’s whole selling point was "keeping you in the moment," but the gadget is so new and unfamiliar that wearing it, ironically, might actively eject you from the moment (or from a bar). But someday, Glass (in some form or another) will likely achieve its goal. There’s no denying that shooting a concert on Glass is less obtrusive than holding up your phone.
"Glass kind of made me hate my phone — or any phone," writes Mat Honan for WIRED. "Here we are together, looking at little screens, interacting (at best) with people who aren’t here. Looking at our hands instead of each other. Documenting instead of experiencing." Today the line between documenting and experiencing is blurry, but we’ll find equilibrium. "People don’t like [phones out at shows] because you’re putting this moment to work to get likes or followers, that’s the cynical take," says Jurgenson. "The less cynical take is — it’s about sharing your eye, sharing your moment, and in that way documenting can be very much in the moment."
Until we figure it all out, be polite. Put down the smartphone. Then pick it back up. It’s okay.

Why the Indian Parliament's monkey problem has no easy solution !

www.scroll.in
Parliament can scare away the monkeys, but where should they go?



Everything you can say about India, the opposite is also true. In keeping with this dictum, the Parliament of India outlawed capturing or using protected animals such as langurs in 1972, but continued using langurs to drive away the monkeys that surround the Parliament building itself. At long last Maneka Gandhi got into the act, this January, and made the New Delhi Municipal Corporation give up the practice. The Parliament of India is now using trained men to mimic langurs and scare them away, while also shooting rubber bullets that would stun them.

The metaphor is irresistible: in the way our Parliamentarians sometimes behave, the joke they have reduced the legislative process to, the monkeys represent we the people. Except that the monkeys trouble us too. In not just Delhi but many parts of India, monkeys are so commonplace in urban areas we don’t even find it bizarre. We think of them as other animals in our midst. This was not always the case.

Two years ago, I visited Iqbal Malik, India’s best known primatologist, to understand the roots of the problem. The story begins in the 1920s, when American scientists, Malik told me, first started taking out monkeys from north India for research. The scientists usually wanted monkeys who were neither old nor young, and preferred male monkeys to conduct their experiments. This disrupted monkey families from Delhi to Dehradun. As monkey families were divided and as India began to urbanise, the monkeys came out to the urban areas, where looking for food wasn't as easy as it was back in the forest.

Newly independent India, a poor country badly in need of foreign exchange, was happy to export monkeys to the United States. At its peak, as many as 50,000 monkeys a year. That is how much we disrupted the monkey ecology. Eventually, this stopped not because we were concerned about ecology, but because of Lord Hanuman. While animal rights activists in the United States had been protesting the use of Indian monkeys, prime minister Morarji Desai was being moved by religious groups in India. The Americans had promised they won't use the monkeys for defence research, but they were found violating the promise. American scientists used Indian Rhesus macaques for decades to test everything from the functioning of the brain to cosmetics. The monkeys often died.

The Americans aren’t to be blamed alone, of course. The reason why there’s such a dearth of monkey catchers in India is also religious. How could anybody be catching and imprisoning Lord Hanuman? For some years after 1947 central Delhi did not have a monkey catcher because the lone monkey catcher, a Muslim, went away to Pakistan.

In the late '80s and early '90s, rapid urbanisation meant that the monkey menace exploded. It wasn't that monkeys had invaded Delhi, but Delhi was cutting down the greens and invading their habitat. The problem was worsened because custom says that Lord Hanuman is welcomed with bananas. People did this when the monkeys came home, only realising later that monkeys could be aggressive, dangerous, powerful, and that they bite! They also steal, from your terrace and even from your hands. A deputy mayor of Delhi once died because he fell from his terrace while warding off a monkey. Monkeys have invaded the Delhi metro and the defence ministry alike.

Missing the woods for the trees
Why can't Delhi solve its monkey problem? Delhi has tried everything but, Iqbal Malik says, unscientifically. The way they catch monkeys, the way they trap them, the way they release them, making it possible for them to return. There's also been some great Indian corruption: the monkey catchers get paid per monkey, so it is in their interest that the monkeys return. And of course contractors are hired to go find monkey catchers from the lowest castes in Rajasthan and other states.

The main problem with these methods of scaring away monkeys, whether it is done through langurs or men mimicking langurs, is that this makes the monkeys even more aggressive and violent. You can drive them away from Parliament and the offices of central Delhi, from Delhi as a whole, perhaps, if you employ enough manpower to scare them away. Yet you can't wish them away, they will return. A nuclear armed republic with the world's second largest population can't have this passive aggressive relationship with the monkeys whose forests it destroyed to make cities.

The monkey menace reached its peak in 2007, and as a result the Delhi High Court got into the act. It was found that civic agencies were capturing monkeys and keeping them in cages in the heat because they didn't know what to do with them. The court asked them to be sent to the Kuno-Palpur Wildlife Sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh, and although the Madhya Pradesh government was given money to take away our monkeys, they came back pleading that they can't do this. The monkeys were disrupting the ecological balance of the sanctuary. Other states too refused to take Delhi's monkeys. That question remains moot. The mimic men will satisfy Maneka Gandhi, but where on earth will Parliament's monkeys go?

A wildlife sanctuary for Delhi's monkeys
Isn't there a wildlife sanctuary in Delhi, the Delhi High court then wondered. Thus Delhi's monkeys were settled in the Asola-Bhati wildlife sanctuary. It's in one end of Chattarpur, that corner of south Delhi near Mehrauli which today is more famous for its wedding venue farmhouses than for the Chattarpur temple complex. Keep driving inside Chattarpur and you will find a temple of – you guessed it – Lord Hanuman. You will begin seeing monkeys. Keep driving and you will see a dead end, called Bhati mines. Huge green sheets and a gate that's often open. Hordes of monkeys. Emergency-era resettled slum dwellers and a whole settlement of Pakistani Hindu refugees, all complaining about monkey bites.

The Delhi government's wildlife department will not permit you to go inside, even if, or perhaps especially if you are a journalist. You discover you don't have to go inside. The monkeys are not only coming out of the gate, they have climbed those green sheets and are trying to bring them down. When you see the monkeys trying to break down the walls of the Asola Bhati wildlife sanctuary, the image will stay with you forever. We've given them a life sentence, no bail, no parole, no visitors allowed.

The sanctuary idea can work, but the Delhi wildlife department and its chosen non-profits together did what they liked. Iqbal Malik gave them a plan, detailed up to the last tree that should be planted. "They didn't listen to me and you can see the monkeys keep getting out." Food is brought from outside every day, and it has to be admitted that this has reduced the monkey menace in Delhi since the peak levels of 2007. Yet they are still all over the place. Some years ago they destroyed a few dozen plants in a lovely barsati I used to live in. That's why I knocked on Iqbal Malik's door. I wanted to know why these monkeys were doing this to me. Her answers made me stop cursing them.

The New Delhi Municipal Corporation now pays Rs 1.2 lakh per month to the Delhi wildlife department to distribute food to the monkeys in the north Delhi ridge, so that they stay there. That’s a lesson learnt after over six decades of fighting with monkeys. Yet if the Parliament of India and the city of Delhi want to solve their monkey problem, the authorities should go to Iqbal Malik. They won't. Malik fell out with Maneka Gandhi at some point.

While researching the story I wrote two years ago, I called up Maneka Gandhi. While framing my question before her, I made the mistake of using the phrase “monkey problem”, even though by now I had become sympathetic towards monkeys, thanks to Iqbal Malik. Gandhi said that I had already decided that monkeys were a problem so she won’t waste her time on me, and disconnected the phone. I called her back, and explained that I wanted to understand what she had to say. “No,” she replied, “I think you have already made up your mind”.

(Delhi's monkey business has made great copy for journalists since 1950. For foreign correspondents in India, it is a must-do exotic story. Samples of Indian monkey journalism in the foreign press can be read on the blog, The Monkey Inspector's Report.)

 
We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.

Thursday, 31 July 2014

Obama to be sued by the House of Representatives ! WTF !

House Grants Boehner Authority to Sue Obama

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE JOHN BOEHNER IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks during a press conference on Capitol Hill, in Washington, on June 19, 2014Kevin Dietsch—UPI/Landov

The measure passed 225 to 201 on the backs of House Republicans

The House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday granting House Speaker John Boehner the authority to sue President Barack Obama, marking the first time the legislative branch has endorsed such a lawsuit.
The measure, which passed 225 to 201 without a single Democrat “yea,” underscores the burning frustration of House Republicans, who believe that the President has failed to execute the law properly on a number of measures. Boehner has said that the lawsuit will focus on the President’s decision to delay implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate, which Republicans oppose. That July 2013 decision gave companies with at least 50 full-time employees an extra year — until 2015 — to provide health insurance or pay a fine. Earlier this year, the Administration delayed the mandate again, until 2016, for companies employing between 50 and 99 workers.
“I oppose the employer mandate in the president’s health care law,” Boehner wrote in a USA Today op-ed published this week. “The House of Representatives has voted to delay or eliminate it (and we will do so again if we prevail in court). But it is the letter of the law that was passed by Congress and signed by President Obama. He simply cannot unilaterally rewrite it.”
Democrats are furious at the lawsuit and have called it a political stunt.
“This is the least productive Congress in decades,” wrote White House Senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer in an email to supporters. “And instead of doing their job, they are suing the President for doing his.”
“This resolution is a waste of time and money,” Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, said on the House floor Wednesday. “Today, Mr. Speaker, we’ve reached a low, a very low point. This resolution to sue the President just goes a little too far. It is a shame and a disgrace that we’re here debating the suing of the President.”
The House will have a difficult time winning the lawsuit. In a letterto the House Rules Committee two weeks ago, Harvard constitutional law expert Laurence Tribe wrote that the House “cannot plausibly allege, much less demonstrate, any distinctive injury to itself or its members.” He called the activity a “wholly meritless attempt to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary.”
“We’ll find out” whether or not the House has legal standing,” said Representative Mario Diaz-Balart, a Florida Republican.
“I would tell you that on many occasions, this President has overstepped his authority,” Diaz-Balart told TIME. “Now whether that gives us standing to sue is the big question. But we won’t know until we try.”
— With reporting by Zeke J. Miller

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Have you filed your Income-tax return?

myITreturn.com

Hello!,

This is a recommendation invitation from your friend Inderpal Sethi. He has recommended myITreturn.com to help you file your Income-tax return.

myITreturn.com is an Authorised Intermediary of the Income-tax Department to help you file your Income-tax return. The due date for filing your Income-tax return is July 31st 2014. Do not miss the last date.

Email sent on behalf of Inderpal Sethi (indersethi@gmail.com)
- myITreturn.com
India's most trusted e-filing website.