Saturday 9 August 2014

Rank never retires, officer does: Indian Army

, TNN | Aug 3, 2014, 01.04PM IST
12F5A391-B5D5-4175-9C92-15AC7F7C78D0
Army chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag, marching left, inspects a Guard of Honor in New Delhi. (AP file photo)
CHANDIGARH: Long after an officer retires, or even expires, he is still known by his rank.

Supporting the view that 'the rank never retires, the officer does, the Army has issued instructions that aim to immortalize the rank.

With a view to remove any confusion among the retired Army personnel regarding the use of word 'retired', the Army headquarters has clarified that instead of prefixing the word 'Retd.' to an officer's name, now his address would have the suffix 'Retd.' 

"Of late it has been observed that retired officers are mentioning the word 'Retd' after their rank which is incorrect. Ranks of service officers are granted by the President of India and valid not only during their lifetime but also after their demise. The privilege is only given to service officers," read the circular issued by the directorate general of staff duties department of Army General Service (GS) branch.

The circular, issued on July 21 by the Army has informed all the officers, "the correct form of mentioning Retd is Brigadier ABC (Retd) not Brig (Retd) ABC".

The letter issued by Colonel J S Bindra, director staff duties-I on behalf of deputy chief of Army staff has been issued for circulation on the places, which are largely visited by the ex-servicemen so that they can start the new practice.


A file photo of soldiers displaying their combat skills during the Army Day parade in New Delhi (TOI photo)

The Army officers are entitled to retain their rank before their name by virtue of Article 18 of the Constitution, according to which the military ranks can be retained and used by the military personnel with their name.

According to veteran soldiers, it is for the first time that the Army authorities have issued such ccircular regarding the usage of the word 'retired'.

War veteran and one of the founders of Army's special forces, Col K D Pathak (Retd) said that circular would certainly remove confusion among the veterans. "Rank never retires, it is an officer that retires. The army should have issued such circulars much earlier," says the veteran soldier.

Former commander of Army's Northern and Central commands, Lt Gen H S Panag (Retd) said that it was a contentious issue among the retired officer about the proper way of using the work retired and circular would certainly remove the confusion.

However, eminent veteran and former Army Commander Western Command, Lt Gen P N Hoon (Retd) is of the view that the word retired should not be used by the officers either prefix or suffix.

"Rank is earned by an officer and like the civilian awardees of Padam Bhushan do not write retired after the honour, why should Army officers write retired after their rank or name," Hoon added.

Friday 8 August 2014

IPR Issue. Does the Monkey own the copyright to his Selfie ?

WE ASKED A BUNCH OF LAWYERS: WHO OWNS THE COPYRIGHT TO THIS AMAZING MONKEY SELFIE?

WIKIPEDIA? THE WILDLIFE PHOTOGRAPHER? MAYBE EVEN THE MONKEY?
Here's the short version: It involves wildlife photographer David Slater, who was trekking through the Indonesian wilderness in 2011, when a group of monkeys came upon him and his equipment. "At first there was a lot of grimacing with their teeth showing because it was probably the first time they had ever seen a reflection," Slater said at the time. "They were quite mischievous jumping all over my equipment, and it looked like they were already posing for the camera when one hit the button."
A crested black macaque snuck off with one of his cameras and took, according to the Telegraph, "hundreds of selfies," most of which were blurry and unusable. Save for this: the pristine, in-focus beauty of a photograph of the female macaque's grinning face pictured above, which gave Slater a brief brush with fame and plastered the monkey's selfie on websites everywhere.
Inevitably, though, the monkey selfie was uploaded to Wikipedia in the public domain, and this is where things got less fun for Slater. He requested that Wikipedia take the photo down, claiming copyright; Wikipedia refused, arguing that the monkeytook the shot, not Slater. It wasn't his. Now, Slater claims that unlicensed use of the photo has cost him tens of thousands of dollars in potential royalties, and he wants Wikipedia to pay up.
It all begs a very important question (one that could very well show up in law school final exams for years to come): Who actually owns the copyright to the photograph the monkey took of herself with Slater's camera?
Fast Company posed this question to several intellectual property experts.
"I'm on Wikimedia's side here," said Cyna Alderman, general council of the New YorkDaily News, in an email. "If you own a camera and someone else takes a picture with it, the photographer owns the photo, not the camera owner."
Of course, there's a caveat to this rule, as illustrated by the widely shared selfie Ellen DeGeneres snapped at the Oscars, which went on to be the most retweeted photo of all time. Some argued that it wasn't DeGeneres's property; after all, it was Bradley Cooper who pressed the shutter. However, since DeGeneres was giving the shotcreative direction, a case could be made that the Samsung-sponsored selfie was, in fact, hers and hers alone.
Let's think about this. More often than not, professional photographers don't do the actual button-pressing during photoshoots. This much we know. She'll leave mundane tasks--the lighting, the coffee-getting, the shutter-pushing--to her assistants. Nevertheless those assistants are, in essence, carrying out the photographer's vision, and therefore, the resulting image belongs to her.
It's why Slater is now claiming--and I'm not making this up--that the monkeys in the troupe were his assistants, charged with carrying out his creative vision.
While unlikely to bear out in court, there is a sliver of hope for Slater if he chooses to go this way, says David I. Greenbaum, a partner at Day Pitney who works in the firm's intellectual property department. "If we read into the language of the copyright law, which requires a 'human' to create a work for it to be copyrightable, maybe this language could be interpreted to at least include primates," Greenbaum tells me in an email. "After all, there is a self-awareness and level of expression that primates have. Perhaps the drafters would have wanted the definition of 'human' to be stretched." He continues (emphases are ours, not his):
In this scenario, the monkey could own the copyright in the photograph. If Slater wants to argue that he owns the photograph, a line of legal reasoning might be that he owns it because the photograph was a work-for-hire. Work for hire laws create automatic ownership for an employer when an employee creates a work within the scope of employment. The monkeys were employees given, among other factors, they were probably receiving remuneration in the form of food or other treats from Slater.With the employer-employee relationship established, and a liberal read of the language of the copyright laws, voila, we have an argument that Slater does, in fact, own the photograph.
Bananas indeed! Arguing that the monkeys were his assistants, however, doesn't quite jibe with the aforementioned chaotic scenario that Slater described to the press originally in 2011. He may have already hurt his chances of squeaking out a victory.
"Other than bringing the camera into the vicinity, he didn’t add any of his own original creativity to the end result," Eve J. Brown, director of the Intellectual Property & Entrepreneurship Clinic at Suffolk University, writes to me. "Even if he did contribute original creativity to the photo, he would merely be a joint author with the shutter clicker (in this case, the macaque). In order to establish joint authorship, you need to show that the parties intended to be co-authors, meaning that it was their plan to merge their individual contributions into an interdependent part of a unitary whole. Usually this intent is shown with an advance written agreement, which I'm guessing Slater didn’t have with the monkey."
Again, merely owning the camera used does not give you explicit ownership of the images created with it. (The apparent lesson? Never let a monkey touch your stuff.) "Slater's best argument," adds Brown, "would be to list all of the original elements he added to the photo--developing it, enhancing it, cropping it--anything he did to contribute to the image that appears on Wikipedia."
All told, Wikipedia appears to have the upper hand here, and the infamous monkey selfie will continue to exist in the public domain, free for anyone to use and repurpose as they please.
The female macaque monkey could not be reached for comment.
[Photo by The Black Macaque, Camera owned by David Slater]

Cagle Political Cartoons : ISIS

ISIS TROUBLE

These ten historical monuments earn India the most revenue...

These ten historical monuments earn India the most revenue
As more travellers flock to India and more Indians embark on trips across the country, here are the sites they're spending money at.



As airfares become cheaper and the world gets more adventurous, India's tourism sector has been reaping the benefits. Revenues are expected to rise by 7.9% over the next decade. In 2012, according to the World Travel and Tourism Council, tourism accounted for 6.6% of India's GDP.

Here's a list of India's most lucrative historical sites, based on the revenues they earned in 2013-2014.

1) Taj Mahal, Agra

Patrick Mcdonald/Flickr
Revenue: Rs. 21,84,88,950

The Taj, Mughal emperor Shah Jahan's marble tribute to his third wife, Mumtaz Mahal, is by far the most iconic structure in India, as well as the country's biggest-earning monument.

2) Qutab Minar complex, Delhi

Saad Akthar
Revenue: Rs 10,16,05,890

The Qutub Minar was built in the early 13th century and is the second-tallest tower in India (after Mohali's Fateh Burj). It is made out of red and buff sandstone and is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

3) Agra Fort, Agra

snopup/Flickr
Revenue: Rs 10,22,56,790

Agra Fort, another UNESCO World Heritage site, was constructed under the third Mughal emperor Akbar. Some of the great Mughal emperors lived here: Babur, Humayun, Akbar and Jahangir, among others. The country was governed from this fort.

4) Humayun's Tomb, Delhi

Prakash Singh/AFP
Revenue: Rs 7,12,88,110

The tomb of the Mughal emperor Humayun was built in 1572 by his widow, Bega Begum.

5) Red Fort, Delhi

Dennis Jarvis/Flickr
Revenue: Rs 6,15,89,750

The Red Fort served as a palace for Shahjahanabad during the reign of Shah Jahan. The fort derives its name from the red sandstone that is on all eight sides of the structure. It remained a residence for Mughal emperors for 200 years.

6) Group of monuments, Fatehpur Sikri

Wikimedia Commons
Revenue: Rs 5,62,14,640

The "abandoned" city of Fatehpur Sikri was founded in 1569 by the Mughal emperor Akbar. It served as his capital from 1571 until 1585.

7) Group of monuments at Mahabalipuram

Wikimedia Commons
Revenue: Rs 2,72,93,480

The sculpted temples and buildings in this town, 60 kms south of Chennai, are the remains of a port from where ancient Indian traders travelled to Southeast Asia.

8) Sun Temple, Konarak

Damien Roué/Flickr
Revenue: Rs 2,43,52,060

This 13th-century temple in Odisha depicts a solar chariot. The sculpture features 12 pairs of intricately-carved wheels pulled by seven galloping steeds.

9) Group of temples, Khajuraho

Dennis Jarvis/Flickr
Revenue: Rs 2,24,47,030

Khajuraho, in Madhya Pradesh, is synonymous with this large group of medieval Hindu and Jain temples, some of which feature famed erotic sculptures.

10) Ellora Caves

Kirk Kittell/Flickr
Revenue: Rs 2,06,72,820

The Ellora Caves are located 26kms from Aurangabad.  The Kailash temple is one of the largest monolithic structures in the world and resides here.

WOW ! Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta...

Science Photo Library - Download images to see email in full Image of the Week
 
IMAGES    |   MOTION   |   FREE RESEARCH   |   CONTACT US
 
Science Photo Library - View from Rosetta
 
VIEW FROM ROSETTA
 
C021/5741 Rights Managed
Credit: European Space Agency/Rosetta/Osiris Team/Science Photo Library

Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta. This comet (67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko) is around 3.5 by 4 kilometres. The European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft was launched in March 2004 on a 10 year mission to reach this comet. It entered orbit on 6 August 2014 at a point in the comet's orbit beyond the orbit of Mars. The first mission designed to land on a comet, it is carrying instruments and a lander to map and study the comet's surface and core. Studying comets gives insights into conditions during the formation of the solar system some 4.6 million years ago. Image obtained on 3 August 2014 from 285 kilometres.

Evolution of an Indian boy’s matrimonial ad !

Filed under: Featured,General,Latest | 
The first time a young Indian boy uploads his profile on a matrimonial site, he spends a fair bit of time on it. With time, however, his perspective changes. The UnReal Times’ research wing tracked the evolution of an Indian boy’s matrimonial ad with time. We present the findings here:


Age: 26
Wanted: Working girl between 21 and 25,
[Religion X],
[Caste Y] – [Subcaste Z],
Unmarried,
Religious,
Fair but not too fair, i.e. fairer than wheatish but duskier than pale,
Good-looking, preferably with brown eyes and an almond shaped face,
Slim and toned figure,
Height above 5’5″,
Master’s degree,
From well-to-do family,
Must respect elders,
Must be accommodating and adjusting,
Must be family-oriented and traditional with a modern outlook,
Must have great cooking skills
Must have a lust for travel
Must have a zest for life

Age: 28
Wanted: Working girl between 21 and 27
[Religion X],
[Caste Y] – [Subcaste Z],
Unmarried,
Religious,
Fair, but not too fair, i.e. fairer than wheatish but duskier than pale,
Good-looking, preferably with brown eyes and an almond shaped face,
Slim and toned figure,
Height above 5’3″,
Bachelor’s degree from well-known institution,
From well-to-do family,
Must respect elders,
Must be accommodating and adjusting,
Must be family-oriented and traditional with a modern outlook,
Must have great cooking skills
Must have a lust for travel
Must have a zest for life

Age: 30
Wanted: Working girl between 21 and 30
[Religion X],
[Caste Y]
Unmarried,
Religious,
Fair,
Pleasant looking,
Slim,
Height above 5’1″,
Bachelor’s degree from well-known institution,
From well-to-do family,
Must respect elders,
Must be accommodating and adjusting, 
Must be family-oriented and traditional with a modern outlook, 

Age: 32
WantedWorking Girl, between 21 and 34
[Religion X],
Unmarried,
Not bad looking,
Literate,
Height above 5′
Must be able to tolerate elders

Age: 34
Wanted: Girl, between 21 and 34
Unmarried,
Not bad looking,
Literate,
Height above 4′ (tall midgets can apply)
Behaviour with elders not important, as long as the girl doesn’t hit them

Age: 36 
Wanted: Female