Saturday, 20 June 2015

WOW ! PC-on-a-Stick With Windows 8.1 Launched at Rs. 8,999

iBall Splendo PC-on-a-Stick With Windows 8.1 Launched at Rs. 8,999

iball_splendo.jpg
iBall in partnership with Microsoft India has launched its first PC-on-a-stick device, dubbed Splendo. The Windows-based mini computer, which is meant to turn a TV into a PC or Smart TV, has been priced at Rs. 8,999.
The iBall Splendo will go on sale in early July across the country and will also be available via online and TV retail channels.
Much like other PC-on-a-stick devices, the iBall Splendo can also fit in a pocket. It is powered by an Intel Atom quad-core processor and runs Windows 8.1. It comes with 2GB of RAM while packing 32GB of inbuilt storage.
The device is just required to be plugged into the HDMI input of the TV for a complete Windows PC experience. Some of the features offered by the Splendo include HD graphics, multi-channel digital audio, a microSD card slot, regular USB port, Micro-USB port, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.0. The device has a fan-less design and comes with a one-year warranty from the company.
Commenting on the launch, Sandeep Parasrampuria, Director, iBall said, "iBall Splendo PC-On-Stick is one such device which will be useful for every home and office conference room providing different dimensions to use the PC as well as get great multimedia and internet experience by attaching it to the TV. A true convergence of technology for every age group and for every need."
Vineet Durani, Director Windows Business Group, Microsoft India said, "The iBall Splendo is for people who love devices and want to be connected all the time using multiple form factors. These users are tech enthusiasts who love gadgets, have access to multiple TVs at home, love the Smart TV experience and use Windows for browsing, social networking and multimedia consumption."
Back in April, Google launched the Asus Chromebit offering a computer-on-a-stick with Chrome OS. The Chromebit could be plugged into a display to turn it into a PC.

Inderz Powerpoint Tools - LiveWeb - insert and view web pages real-time !

LiveWeb - insert and view web pages real-time !

A very easy way to embed webpages right into yourPowerpoint presentation - either link directly to the page (if you are connected to the Web) or download the webpages and link them.

Use LiveWeb to insert web pages into a PowerPoint slide and refresh the pages real-time during slide show. Display web pages without ever leaving the confines of your PowerPoint slide show. No coding required.  LiveWeb works with documents off your local drive too. You can specify relative paths. LiveWeb will also look for files in the presentation folder if the files have local drive information and cannot be located at the location specified by the user during slideshow. LiveWeb encapsulates the need to insert a web browser control manually and write code to update the web pages within the control during the slide show.

http://skp.mvps.org/liveweb.htm


NATGEO - A Quick Guide to Spotting Graphics That Lie

A Quick Guide to Spotting Graphics That Lie

We tend to believe what numbers say, but just because they're on a chart, that doesn’t make them true.
Numbers themselves don’t lie, but how we represent them can be really misleading. While charts and graphics can help us visualize large amounts of data, they can also be dangerous in the wrong hands.
The good news first: If the chart is not plain lying, just playing with the way we perceive visual information, there are some tips you can use to reveal the truth. The bad news is that you might have to do this analysis quickly if a chart flashes by quickly on a TV screen. Also, let’s be honest: Not everybody is willing to look further into a chart if the result confirms what they want to believe.
If you want to detect a cheating chart, here’s a quick guide to the most common tricks:

1. Broken scales show drama where it doesn't exist.

This is probably the most common way graphics lie, whether intentional or not. Something that changes by 0.1 percent over 10 years and something that changes by 1,000 percent in one year can look exactly the same depending on the scale, or range of values used on the chart.

SOURCE: BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
Both charts show how unemployment rate has changed in the United States from January 2014 to May 2015 (6.6% to 5.5%). The chart on the left breaks the scale (left) to begin at 5.25%, which depicts a more dramatic scenario than reality (right).

It gets worse when we compare two different elements. In this case we’re not just adding drama to the change, we're making unfair comparisons.

SOURCE: MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL
When we don’t show the full extent of the bars, the difference between bars looks much bigger than it really is, missing the point of the visual comparison.
That doesn’t mean that charts should never break a scale. Maybe we want to show deviation from 50%, and that should be our starting point. But there has to be a good reason to do it. Showing a more dramatic view of the change is not one.

2. Showing data on two different scales can make for an apples-to-oranges comparison.  

Is 170 pounds more or less than 5 feet 8 inches? The question has no answer because we’re talking about two unrelated units, although they speak about related fields. Still, many charts draw these kind of correlations.

SOURCE: BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
Looking at the chart on the left could make you think U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) surpassed the unemployment rate around March 2015. But that comparison is meaningless.
This lie is usually unintentional. Many people just want to include all their information in less space, but the results still draw conclusions that aren’t anywhere but in these charts.

3. Showing a correlation can imply causation.

Two people doing the same dance moves may not be dancing to the same song. The same way, just because two sets of numbers follow a similar path doesn’t mean there’s a correlation.
There’s even a website devoted to make fun of this non-existing game of cause and effect. Don’t let the form of change look like the reason of change.

SOURCES: BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS; THE HUFFINGTON POST
The lines show a similar trend, but the relationship between Clinton’s approval rate and unemployment seems improbable. In this example, there’s no right way to do it. They are just unrelated.

4. Ignoring population size makes rates impossible to compare.

There are also many ways to lie with maps, which we won’t dive into in this post. Still, when we’re talking about where people live it's important to have in mind how many people live there.

SOURCE: FBI'S UNIFORM CRIME REPORT
Chicago and New York suffered more murders in 2014 than Detroit, but that doesn’t mean they’re more dangerous. If you look at how many people live in each city, the comparison changes greatly.
Which cities have the highest number of murders? Not the most dangerous, but the most populated. More people = more everything.

5. Decoration can be deceiving.

Who doesn't love 3D pie-charts? (Disclosure: many people, including me.) Yet they have a big audience in scientific papers, economic reports, and PowerPoint charts. They look fun and modern, but including volume and perspective in a chart where they don't mean something is a big no-no.
If you’re making a chart to visualize amounts and you distort the way amounts are visualized… what’s the point of making a chart?

SOURCE: PEWRESEARCHCENTER
In the chart on the left, the percentage of Christians is the biggest value, but a larger amount of green shows for Muslims because of the 3-D effect.

Of course, there are many more ways to lie with charts—some subtle, some not—just as there are ways to mislead with words and pictures. The biggest enemies of chart cheats are context, analysis, and common sense. Try to apply those next time you see some "shocking truth" in the form of a chart.

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Inder Sethi's invitation is awaiting your response

 
 
Inder Sethi would like to connect on LinkedIn. How would you like to respond?
Inder Sethi
Colonel in the Indian Army
Confirm you know Inder
You received an invitation to connect. LinkedIn will use your email address to make suggestions to our members in features like People You May Know. Unsubscribe
If you need assistance or have questions, please contact LinkedIn Customer Service.
© 2015, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

Saturday, 7 March 2015

What Your Professional Bio Needs to Get Noticed

BUSINESS WRITING
Harvard Business Review

What Your Professional Bio Needs to Get Noticed

Meredith Fineman
MARCH 2, 2015
   
A professional bio is something that everyone needs, but not everyone bothers to write one. Or they write one once, and then never update it. Or they wait until a conference organizer asks them to send one in, and just jot down the first few things that occur to them.

That’s a pretty big missed opportunity. Your bio is a strategic play and should be treated as such. A bio can help you get hired, gain visibility, and win you serious respect. That’s why when I work with my clients, the first thing we work on is their bio.

Here are some of the main mistakes I see.

A lack of consistency. The biggest issue I see when working with client’s bios is a lack of consistency. If a journalist or recruiter cannot figure out who you are in under 30 seconds (because you have six different bios in six different places), you’ve lost your chance. You want to communicate who you are and what you do in a way that spans multiple websites. This means that all bios — from your personal website to your LinkedIn profile to your company’s site — need to be the same. You need to tell people who you are and drive the point home.

Everyone needs a long, short, and two-line bio. A long bio can be a full page, and can go on your personal website. A short bio is about a paragraph — probably the first paragraph of your long bio — and can serve as your default bio. A two-line bio can go under your byline or in a quick panel description. How do you decide what to cut for the shorter versions? Think of it as trying to give your bio as an elevator pitch. What summarizes you? Philanthropist? Serial entrepreneur? Connector? Try to describe yourself in 15 seconds. What you get across in there should be in your short bio.

The information is stale. Updating your bio regularly is very important. (This also means updating the short bio and two-line bio as well.) Every six months you should be revisiting your bio to see what has changed and what other experience you have accrued. Set a recurring calendar remind to do it. Have someone else read over it too — it’s hard to write about yourself, and you might be leaving a few things out.

There are no links. It drives me crazy to see accomplished people using bios that do not link to their work. Unless your bio is printed out on paper, such as in a pamphlet for a panel, link to your work. If you discuss running a campaign for a new product, show the outcome. Link to pieces you’ve written, press releases about an award, or your personal website. Your bio is a tool to showcase you and your work — and you need to make that as easy as possible for the reader. Don’t assume that someone will read your bio, alight on something you’ve done, open a browser tab, Google that accomplishment, search through the results, and then read about it. That’s too much work. You need to present it all, and hope that they will click on it. (You can also use bit.ly, which will allow you to track the number of clicks each link gets.)

Weak verbs. A cardinal sin is using the passive voice. When someone has used the passive voice in their bio, it always feels to me like they’re trying to downplay their achievements. The point of your bio is to emphasize your achievements. You are a person who has done things, so you need to write it that way — like you are proud and you mean it. Another type of downplaying is using verbs that suggest you are ”trying to” or “attempting” to do something, be that change an industry or work with an idea. That makes it sound like you’ve already failed. Remove it. You are not attempting to do it, you are doing it.

It’s just a list. A bio isn’t just a list of jobs followed by your degrees. A bio is a chance to sing your own praises about prizes, things you’ve written, positions you have held. Discuss an exciting project that received exposure and praise. It can contain information on passion projects, upcoming projects, or hobbies. Be careful to not be too casual or say things like, “In her spare time you can find Alice trying out the latest in microbrews.” This is a professional bio, so while you can include your hobbies, choose carefully and be straightforward rather than coy. Professional bios are not, in my experience, the place to be playful.

However, don’t throw in the kitchen sink. Every accomplishment you include should be there for a reason. And certain skills — like knowing how to use Photoshop or Excel — are such common skills you don’t need to list them. When it comes to your academic accomplishments, feel free to list your undergraduate or graduate degrees, but draw the line there. You don’t need to go into details (or high school).

The person refers to herself by her first name. ”William is an expert in iambic pentameter and revenge plots” does not sound as professional as saying that “Shakespeare” is an expert in those things. Not only is using your last name more professional, it’s also more memorable, since last names tend to be rarer than first names. What about referring to yourself as a “ninja” or “rockstar”? Drop it. While that might work in technology or the start-up world, it won’t read as professionally in more traditional industries. You want your bio to be something that travels across industries.

There are no calls to action. Your bio as a marketing tool for your business and for your career. If you speak, link to how to book you. If you offer an online course, link to that too. It would be a waste to have someone read your bio and not become a potential customer. That being said, any more than two calls to action reads as a hard sell, which isn’t the point of your bio. You want to save the calls to action for the most important clicks.

Tighten, strengthen, and regularly update your bio. When used correctly, it’s a tool that can help you stand out.

Meredith Fineman is the founder of FinePoint, a company that empowers leadership through public relations tactics. Her latest program is a bootcamp called Do You (But Better), a primer for personal brand and professional confidence via PR practices. You can read more of her writing here.

Thursday, 9 October 2014

TSP Solver and Generator

This is wonderful tool to generate and solve Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) tasks. It uses Branch and Bound method for solving. An input is a number of cities and a matrix of city-to-city travel prices. The matrix can be populated with random values in a given range (useful for generating tasks). The result is an optimal route, its price, step-by-step matrices of solving and solving graph. The task can be saved in internal binary format and opened later. The result can be printed or saved as PDF, HTML, or ODF.

TSPSG may be useful for teachers to generate test tasks or just for regular users to solve TSPs. Also, it may be used as an example of using Branch and Bound method to solve a particular task.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/tspsg/

or

click the direct link below

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/tspsg/0.1.4.170-beta2/TSPSG-v0.1-beta2-setup.exe


Monday, 6 October 2014